In which delivery method is the construction administrator most like a consultant?

In the Construction Manager (CM) agency delivery method, the construction administrator operates in a capacity that closely resembles that of a consultant. This is because the CM agency acts as the owner's representative, providing specialized knowledge and management skills throughout the project while prioritizing the owner's interests.

In this framework, the construction administrator collaborates with various stakeholders, including architects and contractors, to ensure that the project aligns with the owner's goals, budget, and schedule. This role often involves advising the owner on a range of issues, from design to cost management and contractor selection, similar to a consultant's functions.

By taking on this advisory position, the construction administrator in the CM agency model ensures that the decision-making process is in the best interest of the owner, which is a hallmark of a consultant's role. The construction administrator does not typically assume financial risk or direct control over the construction process, differentiating this method from others like CM at risk or lump sum, where the manager has more direct responsibility and risk for the project outcomes.

In summary, in the CM agency method, the construction administrator's role as an advocate and advisor to the owner closely parallels that of a consultant, making this option the most fitting choice.